![2012 apple mac pro 2x 2.66ghz ram 2012 apple mac pro 2x 2.66ghz ram](https://i.ebayimg.com/thumbs/images/g/xk4AAOSwTthea9rT/s-l200.jpg)
![2012 apple mac pro 2x 2.66ghz ram 2012 apple mac pro 2x 2.66ghz ram](https://alvalademobile.pt/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/IMG_6298-1536x1536.jpeg)
2012 apple mac pro 2x 2.66ghz ram Pc#
And yes, I do assume a lot of linearity based on my 25+ years of tweaking Commodore, Atari, Mac, and PC systems. Of course, as always with every CPU, memory chip, benchmark and OS version, etc., your mileage may very and the projections for Geekbench are measures by an average with a larger data set. So, again, unless Apple has added some secret sauce to the 2012 Mac Pro, this is about what you might expect to see on average Mac Pros on Geekbench 2 from the site Mac Pro (Mid 2010) Intel Xeon X5670 2930 MHz (12 cores) = 24,276. Geekbench 2 has components that are proxies for certain graphics and other tasks. So unless Apple has added some secret sauce to the 2012 Mac Pro, this is about what you might expect to see: Mac Pro on Cinebench 11.5 from the site : Cinebench is a close proxy to rendering prowess in Cinema 4d. Here are my projections and the basis for each one. They're just not so commonly found (specifically mac benchmarks). If I had benchmarks with Houdini and Nuke from any site, I'd link them for you. Sometimes they're missing features (no 10 bit displayport ). Those cards aren't as popular under OSX specifically, so they're not as well tuned. You should check benchmarks and stability with Nuke and Houdini. There it might be slower on certain functions as it doesn't seem to support opencl The Quadro 4000 Mac edition is available on Amazon and other places for much less than Apple charges (Apple never passed along the price drop). Just a note on Quadro cards, they are faster than the 5870. The reason to go for the 12 core would be more for Nuke/Houdini, especially if you're rendering out on the same machine. The difference is unlikely (could search more on it) to be too noticeable when you're not rendering as this is just a bump between similar cpus of the same generation. Basically the Westmere cpus that came out in 2010 and the board revision from 2009 (with updated firmware) are still in use today. Apple didn't come out with Sandy Bridge E models which was disappointing. The 2.4 would be slightly slower than the 2.66 (probably same margin). This is an older one from the 2010 models.